User talk:TheGrandAmanin

--TheGrandAmanin (talk) 22:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fred

I have nominated Category:Fred (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite ^Talk 06:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 May 6

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 May 6, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Matorothumb.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Matorothumb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 20:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matoro

Deleted content cause that EEMIV loser posted it.

How is it vandalism? I know my stuff. Go [bionicle.wikia.com/wiki/Matoro here], [www.biosector01.com/wiki/index.php/Matoro here], and here. Sheesh. If you don't know what the heck the article covers, find someone who knows the subject, don't just go around all willy-nilly deleting it. Sheesh. --TheGrandAmanin (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, who cares about it not meeting the ERD and the FRF and whatnot. It's not like I read through the guidlines in my spare time, you know. --TheGrandAmanin (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:TheGrandAmanin

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Category:TheGrandAmanin, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MatoromotionPictures

A tag has been placed on MatoromotionPictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WWGB (talk) 14:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:EEMIV. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Duplicating warning here, since this edit makes clear the IP vandalism is from an IP address you claim is yours. --EEMIV (talk) 00:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wowww...I'm beginning to think that you're a computer, as you talk about your own page as if it's as inconsequential as a page on root beer playdoh. --TheGrandAmanin (talk) 12:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Christmas cash.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Christmas cash.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 23:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Season 20 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Season 20. Since you had some involvement with the Season 20 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 19:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]